Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Adams, Unpublished Decision (5-1-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 2002No. Case No. 14-01-27Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Plaintiffs-Appellants, John and Christine Harmon ("Appellants"), appeal from a judgment entered by the Union County Common Pleas Court, wherein the court found that Appellants' claims were barred by res judicata, granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee, Mike Adams ("Appellee"), and imposed sanctions against Appellants and their counsel for frivolous litigation pursuant to Civ.R. 11 and R.C. 2323.51.

Appellants maintain that their action is not barred by res judicata because their continuing nuisance claim does not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence as their…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. National Amusements, Inc. v. City of SpringdaleOhio Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API