Legal Opinion
State v. Gove
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 25, 1994No. 92-03-34749; CA A76828PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant is a police officer of the City of La Grande. He was charged with first degree official misconduct, ORS 162.415(1), and harassment, ORS 166.065, arising out of his requests that a 24-year-old woman have sexual relations with him, along with other comments and actions of a sexual nature. The events in question took place, at least in substantial part, while defendant was on duty. The woman rejected defendant’s requests. In a trial to the court, defendant was convicted of official misconduct and acquitted of harassment. He appeals, and we affirm.
ORS 162.415(1) provides, as pertinent:
“A…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. GortmakerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. GortmakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. FloreaOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MoffittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- The PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Franklin Borja CAMACHO, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- State v. MoineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State of Arizona v. Tyrone Vaughn HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.