Legal Opinion

The PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Franklin Borja CAMACHO, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 24, 1996No. 94-10593PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judge:

Franklin Borja Camacho appeals his conviction of violation of 9 Guam Code Annotated § 49.40(a) (Official Misconduct) and his conviction of violation of 9 Guam Code Annotated § 61.20(b) (Harassment). He was convicted of these crimes in the Superior Court of Guam; the convictions were affirmed by the Appellate Division of the District Court of Guam, to which we stand in the relation of a final court of appeals. 48 U.S.C. § 1424-3(0.

The questions presented on appeal relate to how these crimes may be proved and to the scope of the official misconduct statute.

THE…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. People v. CoraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Feichtinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
  5. People v. AbrankoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. FeerickNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. State of Arizona v. Tyrone Vaughn HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2021
  5. State v. SargentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API