Legal Opinion

Tee v. Albertsons, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1992No. WCB 88-11538; CA A64558; SC S38437Published

1Opinion of the Court

842 P.2d 374 (1992)

314 Or. 633

In the Matter of the Compensation of Betty S. Tee, Claimant.

Betty S. TEE, Petitioner on Review,

v.

ALBERTSONS, INC., Self Insured Employer, Respondent on Review.

WCB 88-11538; CA A64558; SC S38437.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted January 14, 1992.

Decided November 25, 1992.

Kevin N. Keaney, of Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review and filed the petition for review.

Thomas M. Christ, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review and filed the response to the petition.

Donald M. Hooton,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Tee v. Albertsons, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Frame v. Crown ZellerbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API