Hamilton Nat. Bank v. Long
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PER CHRIAM.
The only question involved in this appeal is the priority of liens as between a garnisheeing creditor (Hamilton National Bank) of a contractor (Long) and material men (Scott) furnishing materials and work to the con*565tractor for the erection of a building. An admitted unpaid balance dne from the owner (The Stop Enst Company) to the contractor was paid in to court. This fund is the subject matter of the suit.
We granted certiorari because, even though the two lower courts arrived at the same conclusion, their method of arriving at this conclusion was based on different legal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell v. AmoTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Gray v. HouckTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- New Haven Orphan Asylum v. James A. Haggerty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Pettus v. Dudley Bar Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- W. T. Hardison & Co. v. YeamanTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- NLT Computer Services Corp. v. Capital Computer Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
- Knoxville Structural Steel Company v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
- Andrews Distributing Co. v. Oak Square at Gatlinburg, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Barker's Inc. v. B.D.J. Development Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- First State Bank v. StaceyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.