Legal Opinion

Gatzke v. Weiss

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 11, 2008No. 08-415PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

On March 23, 2007, the appellants, David Gatzke and others (hereinafter “Gatzke”), as taxpayers of Arkansas, sued appellees, Richard Weiss, Director of the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration; Anne Laidlaw, interim director of the Arkansas Building Authority; and certain public university officials. Gatzke alleged that Act 961 of 1997, codified at Arkansas Code Annotated section 19-4-1413, and Act 1626 of 2001, codified at Arkansas Code Annotated section 19-4-1415, (hereinafter “the Acts”) violate article 19, section 16 of the Arkansas Constitution…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Eduardo Burkhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. Fones Hardware Co. v. ErbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Cole v. LawsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Reinert v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. City of Fayetteville v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Baptist Health v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Martin v. HaasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  3. SIMPSON HOUSING SOLUTIONS, LLC. v. HernandezSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Washington County v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Forrester v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API