Legal Opinion

Akin v. Jones

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1894PublishedCited by 23 opinions

FROM MAURY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Maury County. A. J. AbeRNathy, Oh.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

The question presented in this record, stated in general terms, is, whether the holder of two certain checks drawn by the Bank of Columbia prior to making a general assignment, is entitled to payment in full out of certain funds in the hands of the assignee of said bank, or whether said check holder is merely a general creditor of said bank, and, as such, only entitled to a ratable share in the distribution of its assets. It appears from' the record that on October 17, 1891, the Bank of Columbia made a genei’al assignment for the ' benefit of its creditors. The *355trustee ' named in the deed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Risley v. . Phenix Bank of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. &198tna National Bank v. . Fourth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  2. Clark v. Toronto BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Leach v. Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Union National Bank v. Citizens BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Hallam v. TillinghastWashington Supreme Court · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API