Legal Opinion

People v. Carter

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 1969No. Crim. 3413PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J.*

Both defendants appeal from judgment of conviction, after jury trial, of robbery in the second degree.1

Questions Presented

As to both defendants:

1. Failure of trial court sua sponte to appoint separate counsel;

2. Admission of extrajudicial statements by codefendants incriminating the other defendant;

3. Insufficiency of evidence ;

4. Court’s failure to instruct sua sponte on assault as an. included offense and to consider certain testimony of Officer Sanich with distrust.

Evidence

At the trial both defendants were represented by the same deputy public defender.

About 11 p.m., Mrs. Belle…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Roberts v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. GuiuanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. SalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. People v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API