Legal Opinion

Reames v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Oklahoma Health Care Authority

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 14, 2005No. 04-6002PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Patti Reames, a Social Security recipient, appeals the lower court ruling that the Oklahoma Department of Human Services did not violate federal law when it determined that she cannot use a federal statutory “special needs trust” to prevent Oklahoma from taking her Social Security income as Medicaid co-pay. Because we conclude that Oklahoma is not acting contrary to Congressional intent, we AFFIRM.

I

Reames is a 51-year-old disabled inhabitant of an Oklahoma nursing home whose only income is from monthly Social Security Disability (“SSD”) benefits payments she has received…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sai Kwan Wong Ex Rel. Wong v. DoarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. HOBBS EX. REL. HOBBS v. ZendermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Hackworth v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Concepcion Padilla-Caldera v. Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Jennings v. CommissionerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API