Legal Opinion

Creswell v. Blank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1861PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the District Court of Philadelphia.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Woodward, J.

There was no pretence for objecting to the plaintiff’s amendment of his narr. The statute secured to him that right before or on the trial, and the amendment was not introductive of new cause of action, but only of another mode of laying the original cause of action.

The fourth assignment of error is grounded on the bad practice of taking depositions on short rules, without actual notice brought home to the adverse party or his counsel. The exigencies of witnesses do sometimes render short rules indis- * pensable, but depositions taken under them ought always…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mayor of East Orange v. RichardsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1807
  3. Vunck v. WhorlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1807

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API