Vunck v. Whorl

This case is sufficiently stated in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice.

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— The proceedings returned with this certiorari, are a mass of confusion. The best I can make of them is, that one David Whorl was bound as an apprentice to the defendant, Joseph Vunck; that one David Crawford, in behalf of Whorl, but in his own name, entered a complaint against Vunck, for the maltreatment of Whorl;, that Cook, the justice to whom the complaint was made,, under the act concerning apprentices and servants, called to-his assistance two other justices, who, together upon hearing,,…