Legal Opinion
TETAZ v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 30, 2009No. 07-CT-140, 07-CT-141, 07-CT-262, 07-CT-271, 07-CT-272, 07-CT-273, 07-CT-284, 07-CT-285, 07-CT-410, 07-CT-434Published
1Opinion of the Court
976 A.2d 907 (2009)
Eve L. TETAZ, et al., Appellants,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.
Nos. 07-CT-140, 07-CT-141, 07-CT-262, 07-CT-271, 07-CT-272, 07-CT-273, 07-CT-284, 07-CT-285, 07-CT-410, 07-CT-434.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued April 2, 2009.
Decided July 30, 2009.
Mark L. Goldstone, Washington, DC, appointed by the court, for appellants.
Max Obuszewski filed a brief, pro se.
Johnny Barber filed a brief, pro se.
Sidney R. Bixler, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Peter J. Nickles, Acting Attorney General for the District of Columbia at the time the brief was filed, Todd S. Kim,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. GraceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.