Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Steven W. Fisher, J.

This motion to suppress physical evidence presents two *513unusual issues, both involving a criminal defendant’s standing to challenge a search and seizure. The first is whether standing derived solely from the prosecution’s reliance upon a statutory presumption (see, People v Millan, 69 NY2d 514) confers a right to seek suppression of additional property which is not subject to the presumption but which is seized in the course of the same search. The second issue, and one of apparent first impression, is whether a defendant can lose that standing by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. LemmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. LeyvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. MillanNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. People v. McKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Chen YeCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1999
  2. People v. MoneroCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2000
  3. People v. IoannidisCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API