Legal Opinion

Howell Petroleum Corp. v. Holliman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 27, 1987No. 85-1363PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a deed construction case. The only issue is whether the trial court erred in construing a 1924 deed from J.M. Holliman to the Citizens Bank of Fayette to effect a mineral exception for the benefit of the grantor.

In 1917, the United States granted a land patent for the subject property to William Aldridge; the patent reserved to the United States all the coal in the described property. Aldridge mortgaged the property, without mineral reservation, to the Citizens Bank of Fayette. In 1923, the mortgage was foreclosed, and the property was conveyed to J.M. Holliman, the highest bidder at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Camp v. MilamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Sanford v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Stratford v. LattimerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Financial Inv. v. Tukabatchee Area, Etc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Brashier v. BurkettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. NCNB Texas Nat. Bank, NA v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Exxon Corp. v. WaiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Cantley v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Cantley v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API