Cantley v. Hubbard
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
1 This case reached this Court with the style "James Bookout Cantley, et al. v. The River Gas Corporation, et al.," but we have restyled it to reflect the true parties in interest.
This appeal presents a question of construction of a mineral reservation in a 1929 deed. The trial court held that by that deed the grantor reserved all minerals; the heirs of the grantee appeal.
In 1924, the United States granted a land patent to George Hallman, reserving "to the United States all coal in lands so patented, and to it, or persons authorized by it, the right to prospect for, mine and remove coal from…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pich v. LankfordTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Sanford v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. ColglazierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Vines v. McKenzie Methane Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Earle v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Strong v. Alabama Board of Pardons & ParolesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Cantley v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Strong v. Alabama Board of Pardons & ParolesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Vickers v. Capstone HoldingOhio Court of Appeals · 2025