Harrington v. Sterling (In re Sterling)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Sean H. Lane, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
Before the Court is a motion (the “Motion”) [ECF No. 18] by the United States Government (the “Government”) seeking to dismiss Mr. Sterling’s amended third-party complaint (the “Amended Third-Party Complaint”) in the above-captioned adversary proceeding [ECF No. II].1 Mr. Sterling’s Amended Third-Party Complaint alleges that certain named government officials negligently administered his Chapter 7 bankruptcy case. Mr. Sterling claims that these individuals improperly denied him a discharge of his debts in his bankruptcy case…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estrada Vega v. Gateway Bank, F.S.B.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025