Legal Opinion
McLaughlin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 7, 1928No. Nos. 3720 and 3726PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error were indicted with 16 or 17 others for *2conspiring to manufacture, possess, sell, and transport moonshine whisky, and also for the substantive offenses of manufacturing, possessing, selling, and transporting the same, in violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). On the trial, McLaughlin and Horgan, with 7 others, not here on this writ of error, were found “guilty on all counts.”
The writ is based upon 26 assignments of error, but all of them “revolve around a single proposition, that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Pacific Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Hart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
- Ridenour v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
- Yusem v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kassin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Danaher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Booth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Danaher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Leslie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.