Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 17, 1986No. 83-1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGILLICUDDY

As a result of a car-train collision in northwestern Indiana, plaintiffs Harriet Anderson, National Boulevard Bank of Chicago, as administrator of the estate of Anthony T. Anderson, a minor, deceased, Nedra Anderson, and Nathan Anderson brought suit against defendant, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company (C&O). Plaintiffs’ 16-count amended complaint included allegations of wrongful death, negligence, and wilful and wanton misconduct. The suit prayed for both compensatory and exemplary damages.

This court granted C&O’s petition for leave to appeal from the trial court’s granting of a mistrial and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Schneiderman v. Interstate Transit Lines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hazelwood v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Grover v. Commonwealth Plaza Condominium Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Tuttle v. Fruehauf Division of Fruehauf Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wiegman v. Hitch-Inn Post of Libertyville, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Van Holt v. NAT. RR PASSENGER CORP.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Seyler v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  4. People v. LambrechtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Ranburger v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API