Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1969No. Civ. 24555PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

Appellant Southern Pacific Company was named defendant in an action brought by one Bambrough to recover damages for bodily injuries sustained in a grade crossing accident. The railroad cross-complained against respondent steel company, seeking indemnity under a 1947 written agreement.

This agreement recites that respondent, called “licensee,” owns land adjoining the proposed crossing and desires a private road crossing of appellant licensor’s tracks. The agreement permits respondent licensee to construct such a crossing, and requires it to “maintain and keep said crossing in good repair, ’ ’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp.California Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Delta Dynamics, Inc. v. AriotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. IT Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Pultz v. HolgersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Southern Pacific Company v. Gila River Ranch, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API