Legal Opinion

Pease v. Ditto

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;-—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

This was replevin brought in the superior court of Cook county by the appellee, Ditto, against the appellant Pease, to recover possession of certain articles of ready-made clothing. The issues were submitted to the court for decision without the intervention of a jury. The only testimony produced was that in behalf of the plaintiff, Ditto. The court refused to hold the following proposition presented by the plaintiff as the law applicable to the facts of the case:

“The court is requested to hold, as a matter of law, that the issues joined herein are with the plaintiff, and that the rig'ht to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commercial Insurance v. ScammonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hawk v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Scovill v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pease v. DittoIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. W. H. Purcell Co. v. SageIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People ex rel. State Board of Health v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Horn v. ZimmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API