Legal Opinion

W. H. Purcell Co. v. Sage

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District from the judgement entered by that court under the mandate of the Supreme Court directing the Appellate Court to recite the facts as found by it in its judgment or to remand the cause.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

In pursuance of the mandate of this court entered on the former appeal herein (Purcell Co. v. Sage, 189 Ill. 79,) the Appellate Court for the First District has again considered the cause and has adjudged the judgment of the circuit court of Cook county rendered therein should be reversed and that judgment should be entered in the Appellate Court in favor of the appellees here, Sage & Co., in the sum of $560.03 and costs, and incorporated in such judgment the following finding of facts: “That on July 20,1895, appellants (Sage & Co.) and appellee (the Purcell Company) made the contract of that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawk v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. W. H. Purcell Co. v. SageIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Pease v. DittoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. W. H. Purcell Co. v. SageIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Martin v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Laughlin v. NortonIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hogan v. Chicago & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. People ex rel. State Board of Health v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API