Legal Opinion

Federal Election Commission v. Larouche Campaign, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 25, 1986No. Misc. Action M18-304 (LLS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

STANTON, District Judge.

Petitioner Federal Election Commission (the “FEC” or “Commission”) has applied pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437d(b) for enforcement of its combined subpoena and order issued to respondent The LaRouche Campaign (“TLC”) in connection with the Commission’s investigation into possible violations by TLC of the Federal Election Campaign Act, as amended, 2 U.S.C. § 431 et seq., (“the Act”) and the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, as amended, 26 U.S.C. § 9031 et seq., (“the Matching Fund Act”). In opposition TLC makes numerous arguments, primarily…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Comm. (Ohio)Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal Election Commission v. The Larouche CampaignCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Caucus Distributors, Inc. v. Commissioner of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API