Legal Opinion
Martini Hairdressers, Inc. v. Potomac Beauty Supply Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 28, 1964No. 3512PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
, MYERS, Associate Judge.
Martini Hairdressers, Inc., defendant below, appeals from a judgment for $637.47 in favor of Potomac Beauty Supply Co., Inc., for merchandise sold and delivered to appellant.
The principal error on appeal is the admission, on behalf of appellee as exhibits in the trial, of certain ledger records, together with the signed original sales slips and credit memoranda underlying the ledger entries, reflecting the transactions between the parties.
We believe they were properly admitted under the Federal Shop Book Rule. 1 The scope of this Rule has been limited by the Supreme…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Alexander Bisno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Clyde AustinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. New York Foreign Trade Zone Operators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
3Cited by8 opinions
- Edward A. Taylor and Dorothy E. Taylor v. B. Heller and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Giles v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In re D.M.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Meaders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Clyburn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.