Legal Opinion

Musto v. Pennsylvania Insurance Department

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLINS, President Judge.

Janice and Joseph Musto (Musto or insured) petition for review of the February 8, 1996 order of the Insurance Commissioner affirming an Insurance Department determination that nonrenewal of Musto’s automobile insurance policy did not violate the Act of June 5, 1968, P.L. 140, as amended, 40 P.S. §§ 1008.1-1008.11 (Act 78).

By notice dated April 15, 1994, Aetna informed Musto that his automobile insurance *1326policy would not be renewed as of its anniversary date of June 20, 1994. In the notice Aetna indicated that its records showed a February 1992 speeding violation, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Komada v. BrowneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Hallowell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. In re Appeal of TabasCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hurley v. HurleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API