Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Armando Ortiz

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided October 30, 1996No. 03-96-00239-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-96-00239-CR

Ex Parte: Armando Ortiz, Appellant

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. 43,551, HONORABLE HOWARD S. WARNER II, JUDGE PRESIDING

2Per curiam

Armando Ortiz appeals from the county court at law's denial of habeas corpus relief. Tex. R. App. P. 44. In a single point of error, appellant contends the court erred by holding that an administrative driver's license suspension did not serve as a double jeopardy bar to his prosecution for driving while intoxicated.

The pending information accuses appellant of driving while intoxicated.…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Ex Parte Arnold, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API