Legal Opinion

McCarty v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 9, 2019No. 14-316Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-316L (Filed: April 9, 2019)1 Fifth Amendment Takings; *********************** National Trails System Act; 16 * U.S.C. § 1247(d); Uniform DAN MCCARTY, et al., * * Relocation Assistance and Real Plaintiffs, * Property Acquisition Policies * Act; 42 U.S.C. § 4654(c); v. * Attorneys’ Fees; Forum Rate; * Locality Rate; Rate Adjustment THE UNITED STATES, * Matrices; U.S. Attorney’s Office * Matrix; Kavanaugh Matrix; Defendant. * Reasonable Hourly Rate; Block * Billing; Vague Billing Entries; *********************** Fees on Fees. Mark F. Hearne,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Avera v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Davis County Solid Waste Management & Energy Recovery Special Service District v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API