Legal Opinion

Rostykus v. Rostykus

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 24, 1972No. Civ. 72-279PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.

The Motion To Remand filed herein by the Defendant Carol Rostykus should be denied. The case appears to have been properly removed to this Court for a limited purpose by the Intervenor, United States of America, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2410 and § 1444.

As removed to this Court there will be no effort by this Court to become involved in any of the divorce or domestic features of the case. Rather, this Court will be only concerned with the Government’s alleged tax lien and its validity and application to certain property of the parties, one or more, against which it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  2. Williamson v. WilliamsonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of PardeeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1976
  2. Truong Ex Rel. Truong v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
  3. Pardee v. Operating Engineers Pension TrustDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1976
  4. Judith Locke v. Dennis MassieDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API