Legal Opinion

United States v. Capati

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 29, 1997No. Criminal No. 94—1238-RPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1117ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL; AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR A NEW TRIAL

RHOADES, District Judge.

I. Overview

Defendants Aberto Capati and Oscar Redondo move the Court for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29. Aternatively, they seek a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motions for a judgment of acquittal, and grants the motions for a new trial.

II. Background

On September 27, 1996, a jury convicted Aberto Capati of conspiracy to interfere with…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Esparza-PonceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1998
  2. People of Guam v. Philips James SablanSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
  3. People of the Virgin Islands v. Jose VenturaSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020
  4. People of Guam v. Philips James SablanSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
  5. People v. ManabatSuperior Court of Guam · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API