United States v. Capati
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*1117ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL; AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR A NEW TRIAL
RHOADES, District Judge.
I. Overview
Defendants Aberto Capati and Oscar Redondo move the Court for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29. Aternatively, they seek a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motions for a judgment of acquittal, and grants the motions for a new trial.
II. Background
On September 27, 1996, a jury convicted Aberto Capati of conspiracy to interfere with…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Esparza-PonceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1998
- People of Guam v. Philips James SablanSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
- People of the Virgin Islands v. Jose VenturaSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020
- People of Guam v. Philips James SablanSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
- People v. ManabatSuperior Court of Guam · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.