Legal Opinion
People v. Van Cleave
California Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1929No. Docket No. Crim. 3250PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
After a careful reconsideration of this cause, we are pleased to adopt in part, as follows, the opinion of Mr. Presiding Justice Works of the Second Appellate District, as the opinion of this court in bank herein:
“Defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary. He appeals from the judgment and from an order of' the trial court denying his motion for a new trial.
“It is first contended by appellant that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. The complaining witness, a woman, left an apartment in which she resided at about ten o’clock on a certain evening. Before she departed…
2Cited by17 opinions
- State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- People v. HatchettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Oaks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- People v. StinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- State v. RileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.