Legal Opinion
Upper Dublin Township Authority v. Piszek
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 22, 1966No. Appeal, 50PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Cohen,
Appellants,. Edward and Olga Piszek, are owners of record of certain land in Springfield Township.
Appellee is a Municipal Authority formed under the Municipality Authorities Act of 1945, as amended, Act of May 2, 1945, P. L. 382, §1 et seq., 53 P.S. §301 et seq., by the Township of Upper Dublin.
On November 6, 1964, appellee filed a declaration of taking and bond under the Eminent Domain Code, condemning a portion of the property owned by appellants in Springfield. Township, for the purpose of obtaining land upon which to erect a sewage treatment works.
Appellants…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- School District v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Mikell v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Gring v. Sinking Spring Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Olyphant Sewage-Drainage Co. v. Borough of OlyphantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Goodbread v. Philadelphia, Bala & Bryn Mawr Turnpike Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
3Cited by16 opinions
- Simco Stores v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- City of Chester v. Chester Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Simco Stores, Inc. v. Philadelphia Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Deer Creek Drainage Basin Authority v. County Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Thompson AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.