Legal Opinion

Henry v. D. S. M. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 29, 1977No. 76-1824PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties to this case are landlord and tenant. They entered into a written lease which granted to the lessee/appellee an option to renew the lease for an additional three years. The lease did not specify that the option should be exercised in any particular form or by any particular time.

Both of the parties seem to take the position that the case was appropriate for summary judgment; they differ only as to which party was entitled to prevail. We have examined the record and find adequate evidentiary support therein for the trial judge’s conclusion that the renewal of the lease was validly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ledford v. SkinnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schwartzman v. Merritt Island Vol. Fire Dept.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Burch v. BrinkleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Alfran Corp. v. Park Isles, Inc. (In re Alfran Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API