Burch v. Brinkley
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
McCORD, Judge.
Burch appeals from an order dismissing her second amended complaint with preju*441dice. The order was based upon the grounds that appellant failed to plead facts in the complaint negativing the application of Sections 689.01 and 83.04. Florida Statutes, to allegations in Counts I and II. We reverse.
The trial judge was correct in ruling that § 689.01 controls the validity of the modification of the written lease agreement alleged in Count I, and that, in the absence of a showing of special circumstances, § 83.04 applied to Counts I and II regarding the alleged extension of the lease.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Painter v. Town of GrovelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Leibowitz v. ChristoSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Ledford v. SkinnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Henry v. D. S. M. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Linafelt v. Bev, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Fish v. Post of Amvets No. 85District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Skylake Insurance Agency, Inc. v. NMB Plaza, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009