Legal Opinion

Burch v. Brinkley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 17, 1980No. PP-266PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORD, Judge.

Burch appeals from an order dismissing her second amended complaint with preju*441dice. The order was based upon the grounds that appellant failed to plead facts in the complaint negativing the application of Sections 689.01 and 83.04. Florida Statutes, to allegations in Counts I and II. We reverse.

The trial judge was correct in ruling that § 689.01 controls the validity of the modification of the written lease agreement alleged in Count I, and that, in the absence of a showing of special circumstances, § 83.04 applied to Counts I and II regarding the alleged extension of the lease.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Painter v. Town of GrovelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Leibowitz v. ChristoSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Ledford v. SkinnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Henry v. D. S. M. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Linafelt v. Bev, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Fish v. Post of Amvets No. 85District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Skylake Insurance Agency, Inc. v. NMB Plaza, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API