Legal Opinion

People v. Bunnell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 2009PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for reargument and other relief granted to the extent that, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered February 6, 2009 (59 AD3d 942 [2009]) is amended by adding the following sentences before the last sentence of the memorandum: “It cannot be said that the procedure utilized by the court is authorized by People v Fuller (57 NY2d 152 [1982]). Indeed, the court attorney did not act merely as a ‘preliminary fact finder’ (id. at 158) but, rather, he conducted an adversarial hearing and made credibility determinations, thereby assuming a role specifically limited to the authority of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. BrusieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. JOSEPH, III, RAYMOND E., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. WeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. AquinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API