Legal Opinion

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 27, 1992No. 88 CIV. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement in the action commenced by the plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”) against the defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board (the “GEB”) embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (the “Consent Decree”). The Consent Decree provides for three Court-appointed officials: the Independent Administrator to oversee the Consent Decree’s remedial provisions, the Investigations Officer to bring charges against corrupt…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick GoerdelerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. AEB & Associates Design Group, Inc. v. Tonka Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Aini v. Sun Taiyang Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  4. MG Refining & Marketing, Inc. v. Knight Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API