Legal Opinion

Tinnerman Products, Inc. v. George K. Garrett Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 18190PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

While the general principles stated in Ordnance Gauge Company v. Jacquard Knitting Machine Co., Inc., D.C., 21 F.R.D. 575, apply to this case, the record presents one factor which differentiates it. The suit, charging infringement of four patents, was commenced August 27, 1954, in the District of Delaware. On September 17, 1954, the defendant filed its answer and counterclaim. The counterclaim asks for judgment of invalidity of the plaintiff’s patents including one not declared upon in the complaint. It also asks for judgment against the plaintiff for violation of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ordnance Gauge Co. v. Jacquard Knitting Machine Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ely Valley Mines, Inc., Pioche Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Americo L. Campini, Leland DonahueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Bendix Aviation Corp. v. GlassDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Great Western Land & Cattle Corp. v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. S & K Airport Drive-in, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Ternes v. KnispelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API