Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hargis v. Hargis

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 17, 2018No. CV-17-771Published

1DissentN. Mark Klappenbach, Judge

I dissent from the majority opinion because (1) the majority opinion has made extensive arguments for Lynn and has crafted remedies that she did not request on appeal; (2) the trial court is not required to hold a hearing on attorney-fee requests in domestic-relations proceedings; and (3) Lynn was not denied an opportunity to respond in resistance to the request for attorney's fees. I would affirm the trial court's award of attorney's fees to Allen for prevailing on his motion to enforce the property-settlement agreement.

Allen filed his motion for attorney fees on March 8, 2017. On March 21,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cummings v. BoylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  2. Stilley v. JamesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Morris v. KnopickCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  4. Dale v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. White v. WinstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API