Grynberg v. Watt
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
In this appeal review and reversal is sought of a judgment of the United States District Court for Colorado, Opinion and Order in the consolidated cases of June Oil and Gas, Inc., et al. v. Andrus, et al., and Grynberg, et al. v. Andrus, 506 F.Supp. 1204…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Don Sabin v. Earl H. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, and Edward P. Cliff, Chief, U. S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Fulton National Bank v. Mrs. Lucille M. Tate, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Steve C. Tate, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. HumphrysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- In Re Republic Financial Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1991
- Roberts Construction Co. v. United States Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1987
- Amoco Production Co. v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1990
- Grynberg v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.