Legal Opinion

Rose v. Richardson

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 25, 1972No. Civ. 4065PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WEINMAN, Chief Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, Max Rose, pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare imposing deductions against old age insurance benefits which the, plaintiff was otherwise eligible to receive in the years 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967 and 1968 on the ground that the plaintiff realized “excess earnings” from self employment as defined in § 203(f) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 403(f). The amount of “excess earnings” when set off…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Eli M. HallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Leslie A. Ludeking v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  3. Morris Skalet v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  4. Koeller v. FinchDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1970
  5. Somers v. GardnerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rose v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  2. James A. Farnham v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Scott v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API