Legal Opinion
Beland v. Estey
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 31, 1976No. 6593PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
Bill in equity by Edmond and Amelia Beland to set aside as fraudulent under RSA ch. 545 a conveyance by Bernard Estey to his wife, Marie Rose Estey, of their property in Hudson held as joint tenants. After a hearing, the Trial Court (Cann, J.) made certain findings and ruled that the conveyance did not violate the provisions of RSA 545:4 or RSA 545:7 and dismissed plaintiffs’ bill. Plaintiffs’ exceptions were reserved and transferred.
The plaintiffs maintain on appeal that the trial court erred as a matter of law in failing to find and rule that this conveyance did constitute a fraudulent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zeigler v. BonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Eastern Shore Building & Loan Corp. v. Bank of SomersetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Ricker v. MathewsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
- Hughes v. Fairfield Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Mulvanity v. NuteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tsiatsios v. TsiatsiosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Hayes v. Southern New Hampshire Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Harper v. Water Pik, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2002
- Riccitelli v. Water PikDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001