Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Riccitelli v. Water Pik

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided October 4, 2001No. CV-00-531-MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Riccitelli v . Water Pik CV-00-531-M 10/04/01 P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Shawn Riccitelli, et a l . v. Civil N o . 00-531-M Opinion N o .

2001 DNH 199

Water Pik Technologies, Inc. and Laars, Inc. O R D E R Defendants move under Fed. R. Civ. P. 14 to implead two third-party defendants in order to assert claims for contribution under New Hampshire statutory law and claims for indemnity. (document n o . 3 3 ) . The plaintiff objects. Discussion Because the defendants did not serve their third-party complaint within ten (10) days of their answer they must…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lehman v. Revolution Portfolio LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. General Electric Company v. Robert Irvin and Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  3. Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  4. Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  5. Anthony T. Venuti, Jr. v. Joseph W. Riordan, Anthony T. Venuti, Jr. v. Joseph W. RiordanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API