Jackson v. Travelers Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentDel Sole, Judge
I must dissent from the majority’s holding that the Assigned Claims Plan [Plan] of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act [MVFRL] 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1701 et seq., does not provide coverage for emotional trauma suffered by a husband who witnesses his wife’s fatal auto accident.
The majority relies on section 1752 of the MVFRL which states that a person is eligible to recover benefits from the Plan if that person is injured as a result of a motor vehicle accident. Then the majority points to section 1702 in which injury is defined as “accidently sustained bodily harm to an individual and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Tubner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Kelley v. Mayberry TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Burns v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Zagari v. GralkaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.