Richardson v. Loupe
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
This is an action to quiet title to the Undivided one-half interest in eleven separate blocks and parts of blocks of land in the outside lands of San Francisco, part' of that portion of said outside lands, so called, commonly known as the Sharp and Sproul tract.
The record shows that John Sproul died in January, 1869, leaving a widow, Mary Ann Sproul, and three daughters, Elizabeth, Mary, and Matilda, his heirs at law. The daughters are the plaintiffs in this cause. At the time of his death, John Sproul and George F. Sharp were the owners as tenants in common of the said Sharp and Sproul…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wade v. DerayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Hill v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Smith v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- McBrown v. DaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Richardson v. RuddyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Buckley v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Field v. LeiterWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.