Legal Opinion
City of Fargo v. Komad
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 2006No. 20050452Published
1Opinion of the Court
720 N.W.2d 619 (2006)
2006 ND 177
CITY OF FARGO, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Eldin Nino KOMAD, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 20050452.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
August 16, 2006.
Tristan J. Van de Streek, City Prosecutor, Fargo, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee.
Jesse N. Lange (argued), Aaland Law Office, Fargo, N.D., and L. Patrick O'Day Jr. (on brief), Fargo, N.D., for defendant and appellant.
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Eldin Komad appealed from a district court judgment of conviction for theft alleging his constitutional and statutory right to be present at trial was violated by the district…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. John Tortora, United States of America v. Samuel SantoroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. William Barton, Anthony Chirico, Rosario Chirico, Dominic "Sonny" Celestino, Betti Frassetto, Frank Frassetto and Angelo VaccaroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.