Flowers v. State

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction, based upon the verdict of a jury which found the defendant guilty of petit larceny. The jury assessed a fine of $500, to which the court added hard labor for the county. This the court had the right to do under the statute as construed in Martin v. State, 125 Ala. 64, 28 So. 92 (Code 1923, §§ 4908, 5278).

No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant.

This record has been examined and considered by the court en banc, and the entire evidence has been read and considered by the whole court. The evidence, being in conflict, made a jury question. The…