Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Federal Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 30, 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Latham, J.

THE FACTS

On July 3, 1976, the claimant, respondent Marcelino Garcia, was involved in a one-car accident when the car he was operating went over a curb, crossed a lawn and ran into the side of a house. The car was insured by appellant, Federal Insurance Company. Garcia filed a claim and Federal began to make no-fault payments.

While making the payments, Federal conducted an investigation and concluded that Garcia had been intoxicated at the time of the accident. Federal’s policy contained a clause which excluded no-fault coverage where the injuries are sustained by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Mount St. Mary's Hospital v. CatherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. In Re the Arbitration Between National Cash Register Co. & WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. In re the Arbitration between Shand & Aetna InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Government Employees Insurance v. SparrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Hartford Insurance Group v. MendezNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In re the Arbitration between Hicks & Royal Globe InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API