Legal Opinion
Acevedo v. Russell Cellular, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 16, 2021No. 1:20-cv-01440Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCO ACEVEDO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01440-NONE-SAB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING GRANTING 13 v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY 14 RUSSELL CELLULAR, INC., PROCEEDINGS 15 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 7, 9, 10, 13) 16 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 17 18 Currently before the Court is Russell Cellular, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration and 19 stay this action which has been referred to the United Sates magistrate judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.