Legal Opinion

Eisele v. Morse

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 13, 1936No. 5587PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Martin Eisele, a petitioning debtor under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended (see 11 U.S.C.A. § 203), was denied relief because the real property which constituted the corpus of the debtor’s estate was not within the purview of said section. This conclusion was based on a finding that the relation of mortgagor and mortgagee — a debtor-creditor relation — had ceased to exist. The only question before us is whether the District Court erred in this conclusion.

Eisele was a farmer and operated his own farm, which consisted of two tracts Df eighty acres each. Against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Donovan v. BoeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Rue v. DoleIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Kelly v. LehmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Shepard v. BrewerIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Jeffery v. RobbinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coster v. Arrow Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. In re ChrismanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
  3. In re GotfriedDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
  4. In re ColeDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1939
  5. Mackey v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API