Legal Opinion

Stevens v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 27, 1991No. 2-90-066-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HILL, Justice.

James Harold Stevens appeals his conviction by a jury for the offense of aggravated sexual assault as alleged in five paragraphs of a three count, ten paragraph indictment. The jury assessed his punishment at ninety-nine years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

Stevens contends in eight points of error that the trial court erred: (1) by continuing his trial with only eleven jurors; (2) by submitting a jury instruction at the guilt-innocence phase of the trial that was fundamentally defective because it failed to instruct on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Koffel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Pete v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sperling v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  2. Loredo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  3. Roberts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  4. Rodriguez v. MumboJumbo, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  5. Esequeil Loredo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API