Legal Opinion

Mode v. Mode

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 27, 1970No. 7025DC26PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHedbiCK, J.

The appellant’s first three assignments of error are all related to the admission of evidence offered by the plaintiff and for that reason will be considered together. The assignment is concerned with whether the court committed prejudicial error in allowing the plaintiff to testify regarding her physical condition from 1964 until the present, her hospital confinements and the number of doctors who treated her, the amount of hospital and medical bills incurred by her and the amount that had been paid on said bills by the defendant, and her reaction to her husband’s infrequent visits and his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. . EgglestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Caddell v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Bank of Union v. StackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Hyder v. . HyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Overby v. OverbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnard v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API