Legal Opinion

Foster v. Magnetic Heating Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 20, 1969No. Nos. 357-361, Dockets 32969-32973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Edmund L. Palmieri, J., holding certain claims of Patent No. 2,-882,384, issued to plaintiff Julius E. Foster, valid and infringed by American Machine & Foundry Company and other named defendants. On appeal, defendants do not contest the validity and enforceability of the patent and raise only the issue whether they infringed. We have considered the briefs and arguments in this court and see no basis for disturbing Judge Palmieri’s findings of fact and conclusions of law…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foster v. Magnetic Heating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. Julius E. Foster v. Magnetic Heating Corporation, Thermatool Corporation, David G. Osterer, Herman C. Morris, American MacHine & Foundry CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API